Inhibition of sema3a in the prevention and treatment of ocular hyperpermeability

ABSTRACT

Described herein is a method of preventing or treating ocular vascular hyperpermeability including macular edema, in a subject comprising inhibiting Sema3A activity. Also disclosed are compositions and their use for preventing or treating Sema3A-dependent ocular vascular hyperpermeability.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/784,499 filed Oct. 16, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/769,255 filed Aug. 20, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,822,367, which is a National Entry Application of PCT application No. PCT/CA2014/050119 filed on Feb. 21, 2014 and published in English under PCT Article 21(2) which itself claims priority, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/767,419, filed on Feb. 21, 2013. All documents above are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

SEQUENCE LISTING

This application contains a Sequence Listing in computer readable form entitled “G16761-00037_ST25.txt”, created on Feb. 18, 2020 having a size of about 40 Kbytes, which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to ocular vascular hyperpermeability. More specifically, the present invention is concerned with the inhibition of the SEMA3A pathway for the prevention or treatment of macular edema.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most prominent complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness in working age individuals^(1,2). It is characterized by an initial microvascular degeneration followed by a compensatory but pathological hyper-vascularization mounted by the hypoxic retina in an attempt to reinstate metabolic equilibrium³⁻⁵. Although often initially asymptomatic, loss of sight is provoked primarily by diabetic macular edema (DME), vitreal hemorrhages and in advanced cases, pre-retinal neovascularization and tractional retinal detachment^(6,7). Of these, DME is the main cause of central vision loss in diabetics⁸, affecting over 25% of patients suffering from diabetes. It is triggered secondary to the deterioration of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) and the consequent increase in extravasation of fluids and plasma components into the vitreous cavity. Ultimately, the decrease in retinal vascular barrier function leads to vasogenic edema and pathological thickening of the retina.

There are generally 3 stages to diabetic retinopathy: i) non-proliferative retinopathy (NPR); ii) macular edema; and iii) proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

The first stage of diabetic retinopathy, non-proliferative retinopathy or background retinopathy often has no noticeable signs or symptoms, although retinal swelling may be present. This is the stage where the tiny capillaries of the retina become semi-permeable membranes (Later, they will leak fluid and blood.). During the earliest stages, diabetic retinopathy is often asymptomatic. This means that there are no noticeable symptoms—such as pain or vision loss—to the patient, but an eye specialist might find signs of the disease. For example, retinal swelling may be present, which can only be detected through an eye examination.

The second stage of diabetic retinopathy is macular edema. The macula is the part of the retina responsible for sharp, direct vision due to its high density in cones photoreceptors. It is situated at the back of the retina. Macular edema refers to the accumulation of fluid within the retina at the macular area (distinct from the condition where the fluid accumulates under the retina). The pathophysiology depends on the primary cause but usually, the end-point is vascular instability and a breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, leading to visual impairment.

When the center of the macula begins to swell, vision may become blurry. This middle stage of diabetic retinopathy may overlap the other stages. This is the stage where the blood-retinal barrier is compromised and capillaries in the retina begin to leak fluid, causing swelling and blurred vision.

There are two types of macular edema: focal and diffuse. Focal macular edema occurs when the retinal capillaries develop micro-aneurisms which leak fluid, resulting in several distinct points of leakage. Diffuse macular edema is caused by the dilation of retinal capillaries, creating leakage that is diffused over a general area. The type of macular edema present will determine the kind of diabetic retinopathy treatment. Early detection of macular edema helps ensure the most effective treatment.

As the disease advances, minor visual impairment can occur. Although patients are still able to see, they can be frustrated by blurring and blind spots that inhibit clear vision. These symptoms of diabetic retinopathy are sometimes linked to macular edema, which is the swelling of the part of the eye that controls central vision, known as the macula.

As damaged blood vessels begin to break, blood can leak into the eye. This third stage of diabetic retinopathy, called proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), is characterized by cloudiness and impaired vision. When the retinal capillaries break, they are no longer able to supply the retina with the necessary nutrients. The nutrient-starved retina sends out a chemical signal that prompts the growth of new capillaries. This growth is called neovascularization.

The new blood vessels that form as a result of proliferative diabetic retinopathy cause more damage to the eye. These capillaries are unable to restore nutrients to the retina because they are fragile and weak. They also tend to burst, causing blood and fluid to leak into the eye. The new vessels also exert traction on the surrounding structures and connective tissue, which can eventually detach the retina. Intraocular pressure can also increase as a result of the new capillaries, as they can block the ducts where fluid is drained from the eye. This condition is known as neovascular glaucoma. During proliferative diabetic retinopathy, scar tissue development, retinal detachment, and blindness can occur.

If the disease has progressed into proliferative diabetic retinopathy without the patient receiving any preventative care or medical intervention, retinal detachment and blindness can result. At this time, PDR is the leading cause of new cases of blindness in the United States. Retinal detachment, macular edema, and the breakdown of capillaries in the retina can all prevent normal blood flow through the eye and lead to total vision loss.

Macular edema is not limited to the context of diabetes. Hyperpermeability of blood vessels and leakage of the blood-retinal barrier can occur in a number of circumstances. The most frequent form of macular edema is cystoid macular edema, which is characterized by intraretinal edema contained in honeycomb-like spaces. CME is a common pathological response to a variety of insults (e.g., following intraocular (cataract) surgery, in central and branch retinal vein occlusions, following injury to the eye, in association with choroidal tumors or in various types of vascular retinal diseases or retinal dystrophies). CME is also one of the many conditions that may arise from age-related macular degeneration.

Although significant effort has been invested in elucidating the mechanisms that govern macular edema and in particular destructive pre-retinal neovascularization in DR^(6,9,10), considerably less is known about the cellular processes that lead to increased retinal vascular permeability. Consequently, the current standards of care present non-negligible side-effects. These include increased cataract formation and a harmful rise in intraocular pressure with intravitreal use of corticosteroid⁹. Similarly, anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies, which in general exhibit respectable safety profiles, may be associated with increased thromboembolic events¹¹, possible neuronal toxicity and geographic atrophy when used for long term regiments^(12,13). Moreover, the first and most widely used form of treatment is panretinal photocoagulation for either proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or grid/focal laser for DME. Laser-based photocoagulation approaches destroy hypoxic retinal tissue secreting pro-angiogenic factors and inadvertently lead to reduced visual field or central or paracentral scotomas. These therapeutic limitations highlight the need for novel pharmacological targets and interventions.

The present description refers to a number of documents, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, Applicant has identified a novel therapeutic target, Sema3A, for the prevention and treatment of retinal vascular hyperpermeability related retinopathy including non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.

Sema3A is a classical neuronal guidance cue also involved in a variety of cellular responses through its binding to Neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1), a non-tyrosine kinase multifunctional receptor. Neuropilin-1 has the particular ability to bind two structurally dissimilar ligands via distinct sites on its extracellular domain¹⁵⁻¹⁷. It binds Sema3A^(18,19) provoking cytoskeletal collapse and VEGF₁₆₅ ^(16,17,19,20) enhancing binding to VEGFR2 and thus increasing its angiogenic potential²¹. Crystallographic evidence revealed that VEGF₁₆₅ and Sema3A do not directly compete for Nrp-1 but rather can simultaneously bind to Nrp-1 at distinct, non-overlapping sites²². Moreover, genetic studies show that Nrp-1 distinctly regulates the effects of VEGF and Sema3A on neuronal and vascular development²³. Notably, it was proposed that, similar to VEGF, Sema3A may itself promote vascular permeability (Acevedo et al., 2008); this is a counterintuitive observation, given the divergent biological roles of VEGF and Sema3A. However, the role of Sema3A in mediating the breakdown of barrier function, such as that observed in diabetic retinopathy, has not been explored to date.

Applicant show herein for the first time that Sema3A is involved in the deterioration of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) function in diabetic retinopathy. Applicant demonstrates in both human patients and animal models that ocular Sema3A is robustly induced in the early stages of diabetes (prior to VEGF inducement). Applicant further shows that SEMA3A mediates, via NRP1, the breakdown of the inner BRB, leading to increased vascular permeability thereby contributing to retinal swelling and macular edema. Accordingly SEMA3A provides a good target for the prevention of symptoms associated with macular edema or for early treatment of the disease (e.g., in the non-proliferative stage of diabetic retinopathy), prior to substantial pathological neovascularization and damages to the retina. Neutralizing Sema3A thus represents an attractive alternative therapeutic strategy to counter pathologic vascular permeability in DR.

Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of preventing or treating macular edema in a subject comprising inhibiting Sema3A-mediated cellular activity.

In a related aspect the present invention provides a method of preventing or treating non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy in a subject comprising inhibiting Sema3A-mediated cellular activity.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of preventing or treating retinal swelling in a subject comprising inhibiting Sema3A-mediated cellular activity.

In an embodiment, the Sema3A-mediated cellular activity comprises Sema3A-mediated vascular permeability. In a related embodiment, the Sema3A-mediated activity comprises Sema3A binding to the Nrp-1 receptor.

In an embodiment the macular edema is substantially non-proliferative macular edema. In another embodiment, the macular edema is diabetic macular edema. In another embodiment the diabetic macular edema is substantially non-proliferative (i.e., neovascularization is substantially low or absent). In yet a further embodiment, the macular edema is age-related macular edema. In an embodiment, the age related macular edema is substantially non-proliferative.

In an embodiment, the methods of the present invention comprise administering a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of a Sema3A antagonist to the subject. In an embodiment, the antagonist reduces Sema3A nucleic acid or protein expression. In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist reduces Sema3A secretion. In a further embodiment the Sema3A antagonist reduces Sema3A vitreal concentration. In a further embodiment the Sema3A antagonist reduces Npr-1 ocular (e.g., vitreal) concentration and/or activity. In yet another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist inhibits Sema3A-mediated cell signaling. In an embodiment, the Sema3A-mediated cell signaling comprises binding of Sema3A to its cognate receptor Npr-1.

In an embodiment, the antagonist is an anti-Sema3A antibody. In an embodiment, the anti-Sema3A antibody specifically inhibits Sema3A binding to Nrp-1 but does not substantially reduce VEGF binding to Nrp-1. In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is an Nrp-1 antibody that inhibits binding of Sema3A to the receptor. In a preferred embodiment, the Nrp-1 antibody does not substantially reduce VEGF binding to Nrp-1. In a particular embodiment, the Nrp-1 antibody binds to the a1, a2 or a1/a2 domain of Nrp-1.

In yet a further embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is a soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide or fragment thereof that binds to Sema3A. In an embodiment, the fragment comprises domain a1, a2 or a1 and a2 of Nrp-1. In an embodiment, the fragment does not comprise domains b1, b2 or b1 and b2 of Npr-1. In a related embodiment, the soluble Nrp-1 fragment does not substantially bind to VEGF. In an embodiment, the fragment comprises domains a1a2 and b1b2 or portions thereof and binds to Sema3A and VEGF.

In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist reduces Sema3A or Npr-1 nucleic acid or protein expression. In an embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is a Sema3A shRNA or antisense. In an embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is a Npr-1 shRNA or antisense that binds to a polynucleotide encoding a Npr-1 polypeptide, preferably a human Npr-1 polypeptide (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 2 or 12).

In a further aspect, the present invention concerns a composition for reducing retinal vascular hyperpermeability comprising one or more of the above-described Sema3A antagonist together with a suitable pharmaceutical carrier.

In yet another aspect, the present invention concerns a composition for the prevention or treatment of vascular hyperpermeability, diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, preferably, age related macular edema, more preferably non-proliferative age-related macular edema and even more preferably, non-proliferative diabetic macular edema comprising one or more of the above-described Sema3A antagonist together with a suitable pharmaceutical carrier.

In a preferred embodiment, the compositions of the present invention are suitable for intraocular administration. In an embodiment, the compositions are formulated in the form of eye drops. In another embodiment, the compositions are formulated for intraocular injection.

In an embodiment, the composition comprises one or more additional active agent useful in the treatment of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular edema.

In a related aspect, the present invention also concerns the use of a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of one or more of Sema3A antagonists of the present invention for reducing retinal vascular hyperpermeability in a subject. In an embodiment, the use is for the prevention or treatment of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. In another embodiment, the use is for the prevention or treatment of macular edema. In an embodiment, the macular edema is diabetic macular edema. In an embodiment, the diabetic macular edema is substantially free of neovascularization (i.e., it is mainly non-proliferative). In a further embodiment, the edema is age-related macular degeneration. In another embodiment, the age-related macular edema is substantially free of neovascularization.

In an embodiment, the above mentioned subject suffers from early stages of diabetes. In an embodiment, the subject suffers from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In another embodiment, the subject suffers from type 2 diabetes mellitus. In an embodiment, the subject's vision is normal (he/she is asymptomatic i.e., does not suffer from symptoms associated with macular edema of vascular hyperpermeability such as spotted or blurry vision). In another embodiment, the subject does not suffer from substantial pericytes loss. In an embodiment, the subject has been diagnosed with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular edema. In an embodiment, the subject suffers from retinal swelling or retinal vascular hyperpermeability. In a specific embodiment, the subject is suffering from blood retinal barrier swelling.

In an embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is administered prior to the onset of substantial macular edema. In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is administered prior to the onset of blurry or spotted vision. In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is administered prior to VEGF inducement (i.e., prior to an increase in VEGF expression). In another embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist of the present invention is administered in combination with one or more other drugs used for the prevention and/or treatment of macular edema and/or diabetes. Non-limiting examples of drugs used for the treatment of macular edema comprises bevacizumab (Avastin™), Ranibuzimad (Lucentis™), aflibercept (Eylea™) and corticosteroids. The present invention also concern compositions comprising a Sema3a antagonist alone or in combination with one or more drugs used for the treatment of macular edema and diabetic retinopathy.

Having demonstrated that increased Sema3A activity is associated with the BRB leakage and retinal vascular hyperpermeability, the invention relates to the use of Sema3A as a target in screening assays used to identify compounds that are useful for the prevention or treatment of retinal vascular hyperpermeability (e.g., non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular edema), said method comprising determining whether:

-   -   (a) the level of expression of a Sema3A nucleic acid or encoded         polypeptide;     -   (b) the level of Sema3A activity;     -   (c) the level of a molecule generated by a Sema3A activity; or     -   (d) any combination of (a) to (c);     -   is decreased in the presence of a test compound relative to in         the absence of the test compound; wherein the decrease is         indicative that the test compound is potentially useful for the         prevention and treatment of retinal vascular hyperpermeability.         In an embodiment, the above-mentioned method is an in vitro         method. In an embodiment, the Sema3A activity is its binding to         the Nrp-1 receptor. In a further embodiment, the Sema3A activity         is the increased vascular permeability.

The present invention also relates to a method of identifying or characterizing a compound for preventing or treating retinal vascular hyperpermeability comprising:

-   -   a) contacting a test compound with a cell comprising a first         nucleic acid comprising a transcriptionally regulatory element         (e.g., endogenous promoter or fragment thereof) normally         associated with a Sema3A gene, operably-linked to a second         nucleic acid comprising a reporter gene capable of encoding a         reporter protein; and     -   b) determining whether the reporter gene expression or reporter         activity is decreased in the presence of the test compound;         wherein a decrease in the reporter gene expression or reporter         gene activity is indicative that the test compound may be used         for decreasing vascular hyperpermeability (e.g., treating or         preventing non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and macular         edema).

Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of specific embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the appended drawings:

FIG. 1 shows elevated Sema3A levels in the vitreous of human T1DM patients suffering from diabetic retinopathy. (a) Western blot (Wb) analysis revealed that both pro- (˜125 kDa) and active (˜95 kDa) forms of Sema3A were robustly induced in patients affected by Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. (b) Wb quantification, ˜125 kDa Sema3A signal was ˜250-fold higher in DR relative to controls (p<0.05); ˜95 kDa Sema3A signal was ˜175-fold in DR patients (p<0.05). (c,d) Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) revealed significant retinal swelling, mostly in the macular and peri-macular zones. (e) Detailed patient characteristics;

FIG. 2 shows that neuronal Sema3A is upregulated in the early phases of STZ-induced diabetes and its expression is geographically consistent with a role in macular edema. (a) Streptozotocin (STZ) was administered to ˜6 week-old C57BL/6J mice and glycemia monitored according to the scheme; a mouse with non-fasted glycemia higher than 17 mM (300 mg/dL) was considered diabetic. (b) At 4 weeks after induction of diabetes, retinal Sema3A mRNA levels rose more than 2-fold in STZ treated mice when compared to vehicle-injected controls (P=0.0045, n=5), ˜3-fold at 8 weeks (P=0.0011, n=8), 4-fold at 12 weeks (P=0.00846, n=4) and ˜2.5 fold at 14 weeks (P=0.0334, n=3). Conversely, VEGF levels remained unchanged until 14 weeks where they rose by ˜3-fold (P=0.0253, n=3). (c) Pericyte-specific staining of smooth muscle actin (SMA) in STZ- and vehicle-treated mice showing that Sema3A expression preceded pericyte loss. (d) Pathologically elevated blood glucose ˜30 mM (p<0.0001, for both time points) at both 4 and 8 weeks of diabetes, STZ-treated mice. (e) At 8 weeks, tight junction (TJ) component occludin mRNA levels remained unchanged, whereas claudin-5 decreased by 38.6% (p<0.01). (f) Immunohistochemistry of Sema3A on retinal cryosections and co-localization with the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) marker βIII-tubulin, of the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and inner-nuclear layer (INL). (g) Laser-capture micro-dissection of retinal layers from normal and diabetic mice. (h) Quantitative RT-PCR for Sema3A on retinal layers of normal and diabetic mice.

FIG. 3 shows that the retinal barrier function is compromised by Sema3A. (a) Intravitreal injection of Sema3A resulted in a ˜2-fold increase (p<0.01) in retinal vascular permeability (VP) as determined by Evans Blue (EB) permeation; a similar increase was observed with intravitreal administration of VEGF (p<0.05) and with a combination of both Sema3A and VEGF (p<0.01). (b) Confocal images of retinal sections injected with vehicle, VEGF and SEMA3A, showing the representative pattern of increased EB leakage. (c) Trans-endothelial resistance measured by ECIS demonstrates that Sema3A effectively reduces endothelial barrier function. (d) Western blot (WB) analysis of Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HRMECs); treatment with either Sema3A or VEGF lead to robust phosphorylation of Src at Tyr416; FAK was phosphorylated on Tyr576 and 577 (sites for Src-kinases); the adherence junction protein VE-cadherin became phosphorylated respectively on tyrosine-731 (pY731), site associated with increased VP; an additive or enhanced effect was not observed when simulation was performed with a combination of Sema3A and VEGF, suggesting action via redundant pathways.(e) Schematic representation of Sema3A signaling leading to VE-cadherin phosphorylation and tight junctions loosening. (f) Confocal microscopy of Sema3A-treated HRMECs revealed formation of vascular retraction fibers as determined by VE-cadherin and phalloidin staining (white arrows; FIG. 3f ); retraction was similar to that with VEGF alone or with a combination of VEGF and Sema3A. (g) Flatmounted retinas injected with Sema3A or VEGF showed higher VE-cadherin phosphorylation at Y731 (white arrows) than vehicle-injected retinas in colocalization with retinal vessels lectin stain. (h) Retinal flatmounts from STZ-injected and vehicle-injected mice. (i) Cell death and apoptosis by caspase 3 assessment following Sema3A treatment (100-200 μM).

FIG. 4 shows that targeted silencing of neuron-derived Sema3A and intravitreal neutralization of Sema3A efficiently reduce vascular permeability in T1 DM. (a) Lentiviral vectors with a VSVG capsid exhibit high tropism for RGCs and cells of the ONL when delivered intravitreally, as depicted by Lv vector carrying GFP RNA.; Lv.shRNA against Sema3A was used to specifically block Sema3A production in RGCs or neurons of the INL in vivo. (b) While STZ-treated mice show a 56.8% increase in permeability (assessed by Evans Blue permeation, (p<0.05)), (c) a single intravitreal injection of Lv.shSema3A at 5 weeks of diabetes lead to a significant 62.3% reduction in retinal Sema3A expression (p<0.005) and (d) provoked a proportional 49.5% decrease in vascular leakage (p<0.05). (e) To neutralize vitreal Sema3A, we used recombinant (r) soluble Nrp-1 as a bivalent trap for both Sema3A and VEGF. Neuropilin-1 is a single-pass receptor with its extracellular domain subdivided into distinct sub-domains of which a1a2 bind semaphorin and b1b2 bind VEGF. (f) Intravitreal injection of rmNRP1 in STZ mice at weeks 6 and 7 after induction of diabetes lead to a 48.1% reduction in retinal permeability at week 8 of diabetes (P=0.012, n=6 (18 mice)). Conversely, injection of a neutralizing antibody against mouse VEGF was ineffective at reducing diabetes-induced retinal permeability at this stage of disease when compared to vehicle (P=0.7302, n=5 (14 mice)). Values expressed relative to vehicle injected retinas;

FIG. 5 shows that conditional knockout of Nrp-1 prevents Sema3A-induced retinal barrier function breakdown. Systemic administration of tamoxifen during a 5 day period effectively deleted Nrp-1 protein (a) and gene (b) expression. (c) In absence of NRP1, intravitreally administered Sema3A did not increase vascular leakage (P=0.36; n=7 (21 mice)), while Tam-treated Tg^(Cre-ESR1)/Nrp1^(+/+) controls show 3-fold higher vascular leakage (P=0.00065; n=3 (9 mice)). (d) Conversely, disruption of Nrp1 did not influence VEGF-induced vascular retinal permeability (p=0.0024; n=3 (9 mice)), suggesting that VEGF-induced retinal vascular leakage is independent of NRP1 as previously reported.;

FIG. 6 shows human Sema3A precursor protein sequence (SEQ ID NO: 1). This sequence is further processed into mature form. Residues 1-20 correspond to the signal peptide;

FIG. 7 shows human soluble Neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptor protein sequence (GenBank Acc. No. AAH07737.1-SEQ ID NO: 2) and

FIG. 8 shows an alignment between rat (SEQ ID NO: 15, Access. Nos. EDL96784, NP_659566), human (SEQ ID NO: 12, Accession No. NP_003864) and mouse (SEQ ID NO: 14, Accession No. ACCESSION NP_032763) Nrp-1 together with signal domain, Sema3a binding domains a1a2, VEGF binding domains b1b2, domain C, cytoplasmic domain and transmembrane domain.

DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The deterioration of the blood retinal barrier and consequent macular edema is a cardinal manifestation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the clinical feature most closely associated with loss of sight. While macular edema affects over 25% of patients suffering from diabetes, currently available treatment modalities such as locally administered corticosteroids and recently approved anti-VEGF therapies, present several drawbacks. Here Applicant provides the first evidence from both human and animal studies for the role of the classical neuronal guidance cue Semaphorin3A in instigating pathological macular vascular permeability in type I diabetes. While classically associated with embryogenesis and neuronal and vascular patterning, investigation of the dynamics of expression reveal that Semaphorin3A is also induced in the early hyperglycemic phases of diabetes within the neuronal retina and precipitates initial breakdown of endothelial barrier function. Using the streptozotocin mouse model as a proxy for human diabetic retinopathy, Applicant demonstrates by a series of orthologous approaches (gene silencing or treatment with soluble Neuropilin-1 employed as a Semaphorin3A trap), that neutralization of Semaphorin3A efficiently prevents retinal vascular leakage. The increase in permeability provoked by Semaphorin3A is mediated through its cognate receptor, Neuropilin-1. Conditional knockout of Neuropilin-1 in Tg^(Cre-Esr1); Nrp1^(flox/flox) mice diminishes Semaphorin3A-induced ocular permeability. The present findings identify a new therapeutic target for the prevention or treatment of non-proliferative retinopathy, macular edema and in particular DME.

Definitions

As used herein, the term Sema3A refers to Sema3A (e.g., HGNC: 10723; Entrez Gene: 10371; Ensembl: ENSG00000075213; OMIM: 603961; UniProtKB: Q14563; FIG. 6, SEQ ID NO: 1) and its functional isoforms, and allelic/polymorphic variants. Sema3A encodes a protein with an Ig-like C2-type (immunoglobulin-like) domain, a PSI domain and a Sema domain. This secreted protein can function as either a chemorepulsive agent, inhibiting axonal outgrowth and neovascularization, or as a chemoattractive agent, stimulating the growth of apical dendrites. It is expressed in various tissues including stressed retinal ganglion neurons.

“Sema3A-mediated cellular activity” refers in general to the physiological or pathological events in which Sema3A has a substantial role. Non-limiting examples of such activities include i) deterioration of the blood retinal barrier; ii) increased vascular permeability (i.e., hyperpermeability); iii) inhibition of VEGF-induced neovascularization at a hypoxic site (anti angiogenic effect); and modulation of axonal growth (e.g., inducement of growth cone collapse). Sema3A binds to the Neuropilin-1 receptor (Nrp-1).

As used herein, the term “Neuropilin-1 receptor” or “Nrp-1” receptor refers to neuropilin-1 and its isoforms, and allelic/polymorphic variants involved in Sema3A binding and signal transduction (e.g., HGNC: 8004; Entrez Gene: 8829; Ensembl: ENSG00000099250; OMIM: 602069; and UniProtKB: O14786; FIG. 7, SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 12). The basic structure of neuropilin-1 comprises 5 domains: three extracellular domains (a1a2, b1b2 and c), a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain (See FIG. 8 and SEQ ID NO: 12). The a1a2 (SEQ ID NO: 13) domain is homologous to complement components C1r and C1s (CUB) which generally contain 4 cysteine residues forming disulfide bridges. This domain binds Sema3A. There exists several splice variants isoforms and soluble forms of neuropilin-1 which are all encompassed by the present invention.

As used herein, “functional fragment” or “functional variant” (e.g., a functional fragment of soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide or polynucleotide of the present invention) refers to a molecule which retains the same activity as the original molecule but which differs by any modifications, and/or amino acid/nucleotide substitutions, deletions or additions (e.g., fusion with another polypeptide). Modifications can occur anywhere including the polypeptide/polynucleotide backbone (e.g., the amino acid sequence, the amino acid side chains and the amino or carboxy termini). Such substitutions, deletions or additions may involve one or more amino acids or in the case of polynucleotide, one or more nucleotide. The substitutions are preferably conservative, i.e., an amino acid is replaced by another amino acid having similar physico-chemical properties (size, hydrophobicity, charge/polarity, etc.) as well known by those of ordinary skill in the art. Functional fragments of the soluble Nrp-1(SEQ ID NO: 2) receptor include a fragment or a portion of a soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide (e.g., the a1a2 domain, SEQ ID NO: 13) or a fragment or a portion of a homologue or allelic variant of a Nrp-1 which retains inhibiting activity, i.e., binds to Sema3A and inhibits the transduction of Sema3A-mediated cellular activity. In a particular embodiment, the Sema-3A-mediated cellular activity is vascular hyperpermeability. In an embodiment, the Npr-1 polypeptide is at least 80, 85, 88, 90, 95, 98 or 99% identical to SEQ ID NO: 2. In an embodiment, the Npr-1 polypeptide is at least 80, 85, 88, 90, 95, 98 or 99% identical to domains a1, a2, b1 and/or b2 of Npr-1 as depicted in FIG. 8. In an embodiment, the Npr-1 is a functional variant which includes variations in amino acids which are not conserved between rat, mouse and human Nrp-1 as depicted in FIG. 8. Preferably, the Npr-1 polypeptide/polynucleotide or fragment thereof is human.

In further embodiments, polypeptides and nucleic acids which are substantially identical to those noted herein may be utilized in the context of the present invention.

“Homology” and “homologous” refers to sequence similarity between two peptides or two nucleic acid molecules. Homology can be determined by comparing each position in the aligned sequences. A degree of homology between nucleic acid or between amino acid sequences is a function of the number of identical or matching nucleotides or amino acids at positions shared by the sequences. As the term is used herein, a nucleic acid/polynucleotide sequence is “homologous” to another sequence if the two sequences are substantially identical and the functional activity of the sequences is conserved (as used herein, the term ‘homologous’ does not infer evolutionary relatedness). Two nucleic acid sequences are considered substantially identical if, when optimally aligned (with gaps permitted), they share at least about 50% sequence similarity or identity, or if the sequences share defined functional motifs. In alternative embodiments, sequence similarity in optimally aligned substantially identical sequences may be at least 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 99% identical. As used herein, a given percentage of homology between sequences denotes the degree of sequence identity in optimally aligned sequences. An “unrelated” or “non-homologous” sequence shares less than 40% identity, though preferably less than about 25% identity, with any of SEQ ID NOs 1-14.

Substantially complementary nucleic acids are nucleic acids in which the complement of one molecule is substantially identical to the other molecule. Two nucleic acid or protein sequences are considered substantially identical if, when optimally aligned, they share at least about 70% sequence identity. In alternative embodiments, sequence identity may for example be at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98%, or at least 99%. Optimal alignment of sequences for comparisons of identity may be conducted using a variety of algorithms, such as the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman, 1981, Adv. Appl. Math 2: 482, the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, 1970, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman, 1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 2444, and the computerised implementations of these algorithms (such as GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis., U.S.A.). Sequence identity may also be determined using the BLAST algorithm, described in Altschul et al., 1990, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10(using the published default settings). Software for performing BLAST analysis may be available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (through the internet at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The BLAST algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence that either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighbourhood word score threshold. Initial neighbourhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs. The word hits are extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Extension of the word hits in each direction is halted when the following parameters are met: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLAST program may use as defaults a word length (W) of 11, the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (Henikoff and Henikoff, 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 10915-10919) alignments (B) of 50, expectation (E) of 10 (or 1 or 0.1 or 0.01 or 0.001 or 0.0001), M=5, N=4, and a comparison of both strands. One measure of the statistical similarity between two sequences using the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. In alternative embodiments of the invention, nucleotide or amino acid sequences are considered substantially identical if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test sequences is less than about 1, preferably less than about 0.1, more preferably less than about 0.01, and most preferably less than about 0.001.

An alternative indication that two nucleic acid sequences are substantially complementary is that the two sequences hybridize to each other under moderately stringent, or preferably stringent, conditions. Hybridisation to filter-bound sequences under moderately stringent conditions may, for example, be performed in 0.5 M NaHPO4, 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM EDTA at 65° C., and washing in 0.2×SSC/0.1% SDS at 42° C. (see Ausubel, et al. (eds), 1989, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1, Green Publishing Associates, Inc., and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, at p. 2.10.3). Alternatively, hybridization to filter-bound sequences under stringent conditions may, for example, be performed in 0.5 M NaHPO4, 7% SDS, 1 mM EDTA at 65° C., and washing in 0.1×SSC/0.1% SDS at 68° C. (see Ausubel, et al. (eds), 1989, supra). Hybridization conditions may be modified in accordance with known methods depending on the sequence of interest (see Tijssen, 1993, Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, Part I, Chapter 2 “Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid probe assays”, Elsevier, New York). Generally, stringent conditions are selected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH. For example, in an embodiment, the Sema3A antagonist is an antisense/RNAi or shRNA that hybridizes to an Npr-1 nucleic acid sequence (preferably a human sequence).

As used herein the term “treating” or “treatment” in reference to macular edema and/or non-proliferative retinopathy is meant to refer to a reduction/improvement in one or more symptom of macular edema and/or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy including but not limited to vision impairment (e.g., blind spots, spotty or blurry vision), retinal swelling, macular edema, vascular hyperpermeability; blood retinal barrier integrity, retinal thickening, pericytes loss and/or presence of circinate rings of hard exudates.

As used herein the term “preventing” or “prevention” in reference to macular edema or vascular hyperpermeability is meant to refer to a reduction in the progression or a delayed onset of at least one of a vision impairment (e.g., blind spots, spotty or blurry vision), retinal swelling, macular edema, vascular swelling/leakage, blood retinal barrier integrity, retinal thickening, pericytes loss and/or presence of circinate rings of hard exudates.

As used herein, the term vascular hyperpermeability refers to an abnormal increase of the permeability of blood vessels and/or capillaries compared to normal conditions e.g., in non-diabetic patients or patients not suffering from any form of macular edema or retinal swelling. Vascular hyperpermeability may be acute (transient) or chronic. As a result of vascular hyperpermeability fluid moves from the blood stream past the blood vessels walls, thereby forming an area of edema. In the context of the present invention, vascular hyperpermeability include swelling (e.g., retinal swelling) and abnormal leakage of the blood vessels including through the blood retinal barrier.

As used herein the term “Sema3A inhibitor” or “Sema3A antagonist” refers to an agent able to reduce or block Sema3A-mediated cell signaling. Non-limiting examples include an agent which reduces or blocks the expression (transcription or translation) of Sema3A, an agent able to reduce or block Sema3A secretion or an agent able to reduce or block Sema3A binding to its receptor Nrp-1 and an agent which reduce or block (transcription or translation) of Npr-1. Without being so limited, the agent can be natural or synthetic and can be a protein/polypeptide such as but not limited to an antibody that specifically binds to Sema3A or Nrp-1 receptor; a soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide or fragment thereof, a peptide, a small molecule, a nucleotide such as but not limited to an antisense or a shRNA specific to Sema3A nucleic acid sequence encoding a Sema3A protein (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 1) or Npr-1 nucleic acid sequence (Gene ID 8829 (human), Gene ID 18186 (mus musculus) or GeneID 246331 (rattus Norvegicus) encoding a Npr-1 protein (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 2 or 12). In an embodiment, the agent is able to prevent Sema3A-mediated cell signaling without substantially reducing VEGF binding to the Nrp-1 receptor and thus VEGF-mediated cellular signaling.

Methods, compositions, uses and packages of the present invention are particularly useful for mammals and preferably humans. In a particular embodiment, the subject to which the Sema3A inhibitor of the present invention is administered suffers from diabetes. In another embodiment, the subject is at risk of suffering from diabetes. In an embodiment, the diabetes is Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In an embodiment, the subject has been diagnosed with macular edema or is at risk of suffering from macular edema. In an embodiment, the macular edema is diabetic macular edema. In an embodiment the macular edema is diffuse macular edema. In another embodiment, the macular edema is focal macular edema. In an embodiment, the subject suffers from non-proliferative retinopathy (i.e., pathological neovascularization is absent or substantially low at the time the Sema3A inhibitor is administered). In an embodiment, the subject is suffering from early stage diabetes. In a related embodiment, the subject has an increased blood glucose level compared to a healthy subject. In yet another embodiment, the subject does not suffer from a substantial loss of pericytes. In yet another embodiment, the diabetic subject suffers from retinal swelling.

As used herein, the expression “early stage diabetes” or the like means that the subject is still at an early stage of diabetes e.g., stages 1-4, preferably, 1-3. Stage 1 is characterized by compensation: insulin secretion increases to maintain normoglycemia in the face of insulin resistance and/or decreasing β-cell mass. This stage is characterized by maintenance of differentiated function with intact acute glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Stage 2 occurs when glucose levels start to rise, reaching 5.0-6.5 mmol/l; this is a stable state of β-cell adaptation with loss of β-cell mass and disruption of function as evidenced by diminished GSIS and β-cell dedifferentiation. Stage 3 is a transient unstable period of early decompensation in which glucose levels rise relatively rapidly to the frank diabetes of stage 4, which is characterized as stable decompensation with more severe β-cell dedifferentiation. Finally, stage 5 is characterized by severe decompensation representing a profound reduction in β-cell mass with progression to ketosis. Movement across stages 1-4 can be in either direction. For example, individuals with treated type 2 diabetes can move from stage 4 to stage 1 or stage 2. For type 1 diabetes, as remission develops, progression from stage 4 to stage 2 is typically found (see Diabetes 53 (Suppl. 3):S16-S210, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety)

As used herein “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” or “excipient” includes any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, physiological media, and the like that are physiologically compatible. In embodiments the carrier is suitable for ocular administration. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include sterile aqueous solutions or dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersion. The use of such media and agents, such as for ocular application, is well known in the art. Except insofar as any conventional media or agent is incompatible with the compounds of the invention, use thereof in the compositions of the invention is contemplated. Supplementary active compounds can also be incorporated into the compositions.

Methods of Treating or Preventing Vascular Hyperpermeability

In a first aspect, the present invention concerns a therapeutic approach to the inhibition of vascular hyperpermeability and the formation of macular edema in subjects by administering a compound that specifically inhibit Sema3A-mediated cellular activity. Sema3A-mediated cellular activity can be inhibited by a number of approaches. Inhibition of Sema3A cellular activity may be done directly by reducing Sema3A nucleic acid or protein expression or by inhibiting the binding of Sema3A to its associated receptor, Nrp-1. Inhibition of Sema3A activity may also be achieved indirectly by targeting one of Sema3A known downstream effectors (e.g., by targeting the Nrp-1 receptor) involved in Sema3A-induced vascular hyperpermeability. Non-limiting examples of approaches for inhibiting Sema3A-mediated cellular activity include i) antibodies specific for Sema3A; ii) antibodies specific for Nrp-1 (i.e., competing with Sema3A binding to the receptor); ii) by antisense and RNAi methods for reducing Sema3A expression and iv) by providing a soluble Nrp-1 receptor or fragment thereof, acting as a functional Sema3A trap.

Inhibition of Sema3A-Mediated Cellular Activity a. Antibodies

In a particular aspect of the present invention, Sema3A cellular activity (e.g., Sema3A-mediated-vascular hyperpermeability) can be inhibited by using Sema3A antibodies. In a particular embodiment, these antibodies bind to the portion of Sema3A which interacts with its cognate receptor, Nrp-1, thereby preventing Sema3A-mediated cellular signaling⁴¹.

Alternatively, antibodies directly targeting the Nrp-1 receptor, which block the binding of Sema3A binding to Nrp-1 may also be used. In a particular aspect of the present invention, antibodies targeting Nrp-1 block Sema3A binding to the receptor but do not substantially interfere with VEGF binding to Nrp-1. In an embodiment, the Nrp-1 antibody binds to the a1a2 (A) domain of the Nrp-1 polypeptide.

As used herein, the term “Sema3A antibody” refers to an antibody that specifically binds to (interacts with) a Sema3A protein and displays no substantial binding to other naturally occurring proteins other than the ones sharing the same antigenic determinants as the Sema3A protein. Similarly, the term “Nrp-1 antibody” refers to an antibody that specifically binds to (interacts with) a Nrp-1 protein and displays no substantial binding to other naturally occurring proteins other than the ones sharing the same antigenic determinants as the Nrp-1 protein. Sema3A/Nrp-1 antibodies include polyclonal, monoclonal, humanized as well as chimeric antibodies. The term antibody or immunoglobulin is used in the broadest sense, and covers monoclonal antibodies (including full length monoclonal antibodies), polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies and antibody fragments so long as they exhibit the desired biological activity. Antibody fragments comprise a portion of a full length antibody, generally an antigen binding or variable region thereof. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, and Fv fragments, diabodies, linear antibodies, single-chain antibody molecules, single domain antibodies (e.g., from camelids), shark NAR single domain antibodies, and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments. Antibody fragments can also refer to binding moieties comprising CDRs or antigen binding domains including, but not limited to, VH regions (VH, VH-VH), anticalins, PepBodies™, antibody-T-cell epitope fusions (Troybodies) or Peptibodies.

Anti-human sem3A/Nrp-1 antibodies have been previously prepared⁴³ and are also commercially available from various sources including Santa Cruz.

In general, techniques for preparing antibodies (including monoclonal antibodies and hybridomas) and for detecting antigens using antibodies are well known in the art and various protocols are well known and available.

b. Soluble Nrp-1 Receptor or Fragment Thereof

In accordance with the present invention, soluble Nrp-1 receptor (UniprotKB/Swiss prot O14786, isoform 2) or a functional fragment thereof may be used to reduce Sema3A induced vascular hyperpermeability. In a particular embodiment, the soluble Nrp-1 receptor functional fragment is a fragment which binds to Sema3A but not to VEGF. For example the functional fragment may comprise the a1a2 domain which binds to Sema3A but not to VEGF.

Inhibition of Sem3A Expression

Various approaches are available for decreasing Sema3A expression and thus Sema3A induced vascular hyperpermeability in the retina which contributes to macular edema. Non-limiting example includes the use of small hairpin shRNA (RNAi), antisense, ribozymes, TAL effectors targeting the Sema3A promoter or the like.

Expression of shRNAs in cells can be obtained by delivery of plasmids or through viral (e.g., lentiviral vector) or bacterial vectors. In a particular embodiment, the shRNAs which may be used in accordance with the present invention have the following sequences.

TABLE 1  sequences of shRNAs against Sema3A. ShRNA target Mature Antisense Sequence SEQ ID NO: TRCN0000058138 Human Sema3A AAATCCTTGATATTAACCAGG 3 TRCN0000058139 Human Sema3A TTTCCCGTAAATATCACACCG 4 TRCN0000058142 Human Sema3A TTGAAACTACTTTAAGAACGG 5 TRCN0000058140 Human Sema3A AAATTAGCACATTCTTTCAGG 6 TRCN0000067328 Mouse Sema3A AAATTGCCAATATACCAAGGC 7 TRCN0000067331 Mouse Sema3A AATGAGCTGCATGAAGTCTCG 8 TRCN0000067330 Mouse Sema3A AAATTGGCACATTCTTTCAGG 9 TRCN0000067329 Mouse Sema3A TTCATTAGGAATACATCCTGC 10 TRCN0000067332 Mouse Sema3A TTATTTATAGGAAACACTGGG 11

Therefore, in alternative embodiments, the invention provides antisense, shRNA molecules and ribozymes for exogenous administration to effect the degradation and/or inhibition of the translation of mRNA of interest. Preferably, the antisense, shRNA molecules and ribozymes target human Sema3A. Examples of therapeutic antisense oligonucleotide applications include: U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,917, issued Aug. 4, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,098,890, issued Mar. 24, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,087,617, issued Feb. 11, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,195 issued Nov. 24, 1992; U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,810, issued Apr. 2, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 5,194,428, issued Mar. 16, 1993; U.S. Pat. No. 4,806,463, issued Feb. 21, 1989; U.S. Pat. No. 5,286,717 issued Feb. 15, 1994; U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,019 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,264,423; BioWorld Today, Apr. 29, 1994, p. 3.

Preferably, in antisense molecules, there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to the mRNA of interest to avoid non-specific binding of the antisense molecule to non-target sequences under conditions in which specific binding is desired, such as under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutic treatment or, in the case of in vitro assays, under conditions in which the assays are conducted. The target mRNA for antisense binding may include not only the information to encode a protein, but also associated ribonucleotides, which for example form the 5′-untranslated region, the 3′-untranslated region, the 5′ cap region and intron/exon junction ribonucleotides. A method of screening for antisense and ribozyme nucleic acids that may be used to provide such molecules as Shc inhibitors of the invention is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,435.

Antisense molecules (oligonucleotides) of the invention may include those which contain intersugar backbone linkages such as phosphotriesters, methyl phosphonates, short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl intersugar linkages or short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic intersugar linkages, phosphorothioates and those with CH₂—NH—O—CH₂, CH₂—N(CH₃)—O—CH₂ (known as methylene(methylimino) or MMI backbone), CH₂—O—N(CH₃)—CH₂, CH₂—N(CH₃)—N(CH₃)—CH₂ and O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—CH₂ backbones (where phosphodiester is O—P—O—CH₂). Oligonucleotides having morpholino backbone structures may also be used (U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506). In alternative embodiments, antisense oligonucleotides may have a peptide nucleic acid (PNA, sometimes referred to as “protein nucleic acid”) backbone, in which the phosphodiester backbone of the oligonucleotide may be replaced with a polyamide backbone wherein nucleosidic bases are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms or methylene groups in the polyamide backbone (Nielsen et al., 1991, Science 254:1497 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,082). The phosphodiester bonds may be substituted with structures which are chiral and enantiomerically specific. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will be able to select other linkages for use in practice of the invention.

Oligonucleotides may also include species which include at least one modified nucleotide base. Thus, purines and pyrimidines other than those normally found in nature may be used. Similarly, modifications on the pentofuranosyl portion of the nucleotide subunits may also be effected. Examples of such modifications are 2′-O-alkyl- and 2′-halogen-substituted nucleotides. Some specific examples of modifications at the 2′ position of sugar moieties which are useful in the present invention are OH, SH, SCH₃, F, OCN, O(CH₂)_(n) NH₂ or O(CH₂)_(n) CH₃ where n is from 1 to about 10; C₁ to C₁₀ lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkaryl or aralkyl; Cl; Br; CN; CF₃; OCF₃; O-, S-, or N-alkyl; O-, S-, or N-alkenyl; SOCH₃; SO₂CH₃; ONO₂; NO₂; N₃; NH₂; heterocycloalkyl; heterocycloalkaryl; aminoalkylamino; polyalkylamino; substituted silyl; an RNA cleaving group; a reporter group; an intercalator; a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide; or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide and other substituents having similar properties. One or more pentofuranosyl groups may be replaced by another sugar, by a sugar mimic such as cyclobutyl or by another moiety which takes the place of the sugar.

In some embodiments, the antisense oligonucleotides in accordance with this invention may comprise from about 5 to about 100 nucleotide units. As will be appreciated, a nucleotide unit is a base-sugar combination (or a combination of analogous structures) suitably bound to an adjacent nucleotide unit through phosphodiester or other bonds forming a backbone structure.

In a further embodiment, expression of a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide of interest (Sema3A or Nrp-1), or a fragment thereof, may be inhibited or prevented using RNA interference (RNAi) technology, a type of post-transcriptional gene silencing. RNAi may be used to create a pseudo “knockout”, i.e. a system in which the expression of the product encoded by a gene or coding region of interest is reduced, resulting in an overall reduction of the activity of the encoded product in a system. As such, RNAi may be performed to target a nucleic acid of interest or fragment or variant thereof, to in turn reduce its expression and the level of activity of the product which it encodes. Such a system may be used for functional studies of the product, as well as to treat disorders related to the activity of such a product. RNAi is described in for example published US patent applications 20020173478 (Gewirtz; published Nov. 21, 2002) and 20020132788 (Lewis et al.; published Nov. 7, 2002). Reagents and kits for performing RNAi are available commercially from for example Ambion Inc. (Austin, Tex., USA) and New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, Mass., USA).

The initial agent for RNAi in some systems is a dsRNA molecule corresponding to a target nucleic acid. The dsRNA (e.g., shRNA) is then thought to be cleaved into short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) which are 21-23 nucleotides in length (19-21 bp duplexes, each with 2 nucleotide 3′ overhangs). The enzyme thought to effect this first cleavage step has been referred to as “Dicer” and is categorized as a member of the RNase III family of dsRNA-specific ribonucleases. Alternatively, RNAi may be effected via directly introducing into the cell, or generating within the cell by introducing into the cell a suitable precursor (e.g. vector encoding precursor(s), etc.) of such an siRNA or siRNA-like molecule. An siRNA may then associate with other intracellular components to form an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The RISC thus formed may subsequently target a transcript of interest via base-pairing interactions between its siRNA component and the target transcript by virtue of homology, resulting in the cleavage of the target transcript approximately 12 nucleotides from the 3′ end of the siRNA. Thus the target mRNA is cleaved and the level of protein product it encodes is reduced.

RNAi may be effected by the introduction of suitable in vitro synthesized siRNA (shRNAs) or siRNA-like molecules into cells. RNAi may for example be performed using chemically-synthesized RNA. Alternatively, suitable expression vectors may be used to transcribe such RNA either in vitro or in vivo. In vitro transcription of sense and antisense strands (encoded by sequences present on the same vector or on separate vectors) may be effected using for example T7 RNA polymerase, in which case the vector may comprise a suitable coding sequence operably-linked to a T7 promoter. The in vitro-transcribed RNA may in embodiments be processed (e.g. using E. coli RNase III) in vitro to a size conducive to RNAi. The sense and antisense transcripts are combined to form an RNA duplex which is introduced into a target cell of interest. Other vectors may be used, which express small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) which can be processed into siRNA-like molecules. Various vector-based methods and various methods for introducing such vectors into cells, either in vitro or in vivo (e.g. gene therapy) are known in the art.

Accordingly, in an embodiment expression of a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide of interest (Sema3A or Nrp-1), or a fragment thereof, may be inhibited by introducing into or generating within a cell an siRNA or siRNA-like molecule corresponding to a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide of interest (e.g. myostatin), or a fragment thereof, or to an nucleic acid homologous thereto. “siRNA-like molecule” refers to a nucleic acid molecule similar to an siRNA (e.g. in size and structure) and capable of eliciting siRNA activity, i.e. to effect the RNAi-mediated inhibition of expression. In various embodiments such a method may entail the direct administration of the siRNA or siRNA-like molecule into a cell, or use of the vector-based methods described above. In an embodiment, the siRNA or siRNA-like molecule is less than about 30 nucleotides in length. In a further embodiment, the siRNA or siRNA-like molecule is about 21-23 nucleotides in length. In an embodiment, siRNA or siRNA-like molecule comprises a 19-21 bp duplex portion, each strand having a 2 nucleotide 3′ overhang. In embodiments, the siRNA or siRNA-like molecule is substantially identical to a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide of interest, or a fragment or variant (or a fragment of a variant) thereof. Such a variant is capable of encoding a protein having activity similar to the polypeptide of interest.

A variety of viral vectors can be used to obtain shRNA/RNAi expression in cells including adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), adenoviruses, and lentiviruses. With adeno-associated viruses and adenoviruses, the genomes remain episomal. This is advantageous as insertional mutagenesis is avoided. It is disadvantageous in that the progeny of the cell will lose the virus quickly through cell division unless the cell divides very slowly. AAVs differ from adenoviruses in that the viral genes have been removed and they have diminished packing capacity. Lentiviruses integrate into sections of transcriptionally active chromatin and are thus passed on to progeny cells. With this approach there is increased risk of insertional mutagenesis; however, the risk can be reduced by using an integrase-deficient lentivirus.

Pharmaceutical Compositions

The Sema3A inhibitors of the present invention can be administered to a human subject by themselves or in pharmaceutical compositions where they are mixed with suitable carriers or excipient(s) at doses to treat or prevent vascular hyperpermeabilty, non-proliferative retinopathy, retinal swelling or macular edema and associated symptoms. Mixtures of these compounds can also be administered to the subject as a simple mixture or in suitable formulated pharmaceutical compositions. A therapeutically effective dose further refers to that amount of the compound or compounds sufficient to result in the prevention or treatment of macular edema and/or associated symptoms (spotted or blurry vision, Sema3A-associated hyperpermeability, edema, retinal swelling, and/or blood retinal barrier leakage). Techniques for formulation and administration of the compounds of the instant application may be found in “Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences,” Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., latest edition.

Routes of Administration

Suitable routes of administration may, for example, include systemic, oral and ocular (eye drops or intraocular injections). Preferred routes of administration comprise eye drops and intraocular injections. The formulations may also be in the form of sustained release formulations.

Furthermore, one may administer the drug in a targeted drug delivery system, for example, in a liposome coated with endothelial or cell-specific antibody.

Composition/Formulation

Pharmaceutical compositions for use in accordance with the present invention thus may be formulated in a conventional manner using one or more physiologically acceptable carriers comprising excipients and auxiliaries which facilitate processing of the active compounds into preparations which can be used pharmaceutically. Proper formulation is dependent upon the route of administration chosen. For injection, the agents of the invention may be formulated in aqueous solutions, preferably in physiologically compatible buffers such as Hanks's solution, Ringer's solution, or physiological saline buffer.

For ocular administration, the compounds can be formulated readily by combining the active compounds with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers suitable for ocular administration well known in the art.

The compounds may be formulated for ocular administration e.g., eye drops or ocular injections bolus injection. Formulations for injection may be presented in unit dosage form, e.g., in ampoules or in multi-dose containers, with an added preservative. The compositions may take such forms as suspensions, solutions or emulsions in oily or aqueous vehicles, and may contain formulatory agents such as suspending, stabilizing and/or dispersing agents.

Alternatively, other delivery systems for pharmaceutical compounds may be employed. Liposomes and emulsions are well known examples of delivery vehicles or carriers for hydrophobic drugs.

Effective Dosage

Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for use in the present invention include compositions wherein the active ingredients are contained in an effective amount to achieve its intended purpose, More specifically, a therapeutically effective amount means an amount effective to prevent development of or to alleviate the existing symptoms of the subject being treated. Determination of the effective amounts is well within the capability of those skilled in the art.

The effective dose of the compound inhibits the cellular signaling function of Sema3A sufficiently to reduce or prevent vascular hyperpermeability and blood retinal barrier leakage without causing significant adverse effects. Certain compounds which have such activity can be identified by in vitro assays that determine the dose-dependent inhibition of Sema3A inhibitors.

For any compound used in the method of the invention, the therapeutically effective dose can be estimated initially from cellular assays. For example, a dose can be formulated in cellular and animal models to achieve a circulating concentration range that includes the IC50 as determined in cellular assays (i e., the concentration of the test compound which achieves a half-maximal inhibition of the cellular signaling function of Sema3A, usually in response to inflammatory mediators such as II-1β or other activating stimulus such as hypoxia, ischemia, cellular stress, ER stress.

A therapeutically effective amount refers to that amount of the compound that results in amelioration of symptoms in a subject. Similarly, a prophylactically effective amount refers to the amount necessary to prevent or delay symptoms in a patient (e.g., Sema3A-induced vascular hyperpermeability, spotted and/or blurry vision, pericytes loss, macular edema, retinal swelling, blood retinal barrier leakage, etc.). Toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of such compounds can be determined by standard pharmaceutical procedures in cell cultures or experimental animals, e.g., determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the ED (effective dose for 50% maximal response). The dose ratio between toxic and therapeutic effects is the therapeutic index and it can be expressed as the ratio between MTD and ED50. Compounds which exhibit high therapeutic indices are preferred. The exact formulation, route of administration and dosage can be chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient's condition.

Dosage amount and interval may be adjusted individually to provide levels of the active compound which are sufficient to maintain the Sema3A modulating effects, or minimal effective concentration (MEC). The MEC will vary for each compound but can be estimated from in vitro data; e. g. the concentration necessary to achieve substantial inhibition of Sema3A expression or activity (e.g., binding to Nrp-1 receptor) Dosages necessary to achieve the MEC will depend on individual characteristics and route of administration.

The amount of composition administered will, of course, be dependent on the subject being treated, on the subject's weight, the severity of the affliction, the manner of administration and the judgment of the prescribing physician.

Packaging

The compositions may, if desired, be presented in a pack or dispenser device which may contain one or more unit dosage forms containing the active ingredient. The pack or dispenser device may be accompanied by instructions for administration. Compositions comprising a compound of the invention formulated in a compatible pharmaceutical carrier may also be prepared, placed in an appropriate container, and labeled for treatment of an indicated condition. Suitable conditions indicated on the label may include the prevention and treatment of macular edema such as diabetic macular edema and age-related macular edema, retinal vascular hyperpermeability, blood retinal barrier leakage or the like.

Screening Assays

Having demonstrated that increased Sema3A activity is associated with the BRB leakage and retinal vascular hyperpermeability, the invention relates to the use of Sema3A as a target in screening assays used to identify compounds that are useful for the prevention or treatment retinal vascular hyperpermeability (e.g., non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, retinal swelling, etc.), said method comprising determining whether:

-   -   (a) the level of expression of a Sema3A nucleic acid or encoded         polypeptide;     -   (b) the level of Sema3A activity;     -   (c) the level of a molecule generated by a Sema3A activity; or     -   (d) any combination of (a) to (c);     -   is decreased in the presence of a test compound relative to in         the absence of said test compound; wherein said decrease is         indicative that said test compound is potentially useful for the         prevention and treatment of retinal vascular hyperpermeability.         In an embodiment, the above-mentioned method is an in vitro         method. In an embodiment, the Sema3A activity is its binding to         the Nrp-1 receptor. In a further embodiment, the Sema3A activity         is the increased vascular permeability.

In another embodiment of the invention, a reporter assay-based method of selecting agents which modulate Sema3A expression is provided. The method includes providing a cell comprising a nucleic acid sequence comprising a Sema3A transcriptional regulatory sequence operably-linked to a suitable reporter gene. The cell is then exposed to the agent suspected of affecting Sema3A expression (e.g., a test/candidate compound) and the transcription efficiency is measured by the activity of the reporter gene. The activity can then be compared to the activity of the reporter gene in cells unexposed to the agent in question. Suitable reporter genes include but are not limited to beta(β)-D-galactosidase, luciferase, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and green fluorescent protein (GFP).

Accordingly, the present invention further provides a method of identifying or characterizing a compound for treating or preventing retinal vascular hyperpermeability, the method comprising: (a) contacting a test compound with a cell comprising a first nucleic acid comprising a transcriptionally regulatory element normally associated with a Sema3A gene (e.g., a promoter region naturally associated with a Sema3A gene), operably linked to a second nucleic acid comprising a reporter gene capable of encoding a reporter protein; and (b) determining whether reporter gene expression or reporter protein activity is decreased in the presence of said test compound, said decrease in reporter gene expression or reporter protein activity being an indication that said test compound may be used for treating or preventing retinal vascular hyperpermeability (such as retinal swelling in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or macular edema). In an embodiment, the above-mentioned method is an in vitro method.

The above-noted assays may be applied to a single test compound or to a plurality or “library” of such compounds (e.g., a combinatorial library). Any such compound may be utilized as lead compound and further modified to improve its therapeutic, prophylactic and/or pharmacological properties for the prevention and treatment of retinal vascular hyperpermeability.

Such assay systems may comprise a variety of means to enable and optimize useful assay conditions. Such means may include but are not limited to: suitable buffer solutions, for example, for the control of pH and ionic strength and to provide any necessary components for optimal Sema3A activity and stability (e.g., protease inhibitors), temperature control means for optimal Sema3A activity and or stability, and detection means to enable the detection of the Sema3A and Nrp-1 interaction. A variety of such detection means may be used, including but not limited to one or a combination of the following: radiolabelling (e.g., ³²P, ¹⁴C, ³H), antibody-based detection, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, spectroscopic methods (e.g., generation of a product with altered spectroscopic properties), various reporter enzymes or proteins (e.g., horseradish peroxidase, green fluorescent protein), specific binding reagents (e.g., biotin/streptavidin), and others.

The assay may be carried out in vitro utilizing a source of Sema3A which may comprise naturally isolated or recombinantly produced Sema3A, in preparations ranging from crude to pure. Recombinant Sema3A may be produced in a number of prokaryotic or eukaryotic expression systems, which are well known in the art (see for example Martin F. et al., 2001. Immunogenetics 53(4): 296-306) for the recombinant expression of Sema3A. Such assays may be performed in an array format. In certain embodiments, one or a plurality of the assay steps are automated.

A homolog, variant and/or fragment of Sema3A which retains activity (e.g., it binds to the Nrp-1 receptor) may also be used in the screening methods of the invention. Homologues include protein sequences, which are substantially identical to the amino acid sequence of full length Sema3A (e.g., FIG. 1), or matured fragment, sharing significant structural and functional homology with Sema3A. Variants include, but are not limited to, proteins or peptides, which differ from a Sema3A by any modifications, and/or amino acid substitutions, deletions or additions (e.g., fusion with another polypeptide). Modifications can occur anywhere including the polypeptide backbone, (i.e., the amino acid sequence), the amino acid side chains and the amino or carboxy termini. Such substitutions, deletions or additions may involve one or more amino acids. Fragments include a fragment or a portion of a Sema3A or a fragment or a portion of a homologue or variant of a Sema3A which retains Sema3A activity, i.e., binds to the Nrp-1 receptor and causes vascular hyperpermeabilisation.

EXAMPLE 1 Material and Methods Human Samples

Approval of human clinical protocol and informed consent form by Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital (HMR) ethics committee and recruitment of patients for local core vitreal biopsy sampling from patients afflicted with T1DM.

Animals

All studies were performed according to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Montreal in agreement with the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. C57Bl/6 wild-type were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Tamoxifen-inducible (Tam-inducible) Cre mice (Tg^(Cre-Esr1); no. 004682) and Neuropilin 1 floxed mice (Nrp1^(tmDdg)/J; no. 005247) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory.

Streptozotocin (STZ) Mouse Model

C57BL/6J mice of 6- to 7-week were weighted and their baseline glycemia was measured (Accu-Chek, Roche). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with streptozotocin (Sigma-Alderich, St. Louis, Mo.) for 5 consecutive days at 55 mg/Kg. Age-matched controls were injected with buffer only. Glycemia was measured again a week after the last STZ injection and mice were considered diabetic if their non-fasted glycemia was higher than 17 mM (300 mg/dL).

Real-Time PCR Analysis

RNA was isolated using the GenElute™ Mammalian Total RNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma) and digested with DNase I to prevent amplification of genomic DNA. Reversed transcription was performed using M-MLV reverse transcriptase and gene expression analyzed using SybrGreen™ in an ABI Biosystems™ Real-Time PCR machine. β-actin was used as a reference gene.

Laser-Capture Microdissection

Eyes were enucleated from P14 pups in OIR (oxygen induced retinopathy) or normoxic littermates and flash-frozen in OCT. We then cut 12 μm sections using a Leica cryostat at −20° C. and air-dried for 10 min. We dissected retinal layers using a Zeiss Observer microscope equipped with a Palm MicroBeam™ device for laser-capture microdissection. We isolated mRNA from these sections and performed qPCRs as described above.

Western-Blotting

For assessment of retinal protein levels, we enucleated eyes at varying time points and rapidly dissected and homogeneized retinas. Protein concentrations were assessed by BCA assay (Sigma), and then 30 ug of protein analyzed for each condition by standard SDS-PAGE technique. Antibodies used for Western-blotting are: Nrp-1 (R&D Systems, # AF566), pVE-Cadherin (Invitrogen, #441145G), Src (Cell Signaling, #2108), pSRC (Cell Signaling, #2101), FAK (Cell Signaling, #3285), pFAK (Cell Signaling, #3281), b-Actin (Sigma, # A2228), Sema3A (Santa Cruz, # sc-1148 OR ABCAM # ab23393).

Immunohistochemistry

To localize protein expression, eyes were enucleated from mice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 4 h at RT and incubated in 30% sucrose overnight and then frozen in OCT compound. We then embedded the whole eye in optimal cutting temperature compound at −20° C. and performed 12 um serial sections. We carried out immunohistochemistry experiments and visualized the sections with an epifluorescent microscope (Zeiss Axiolmager™) or confocal microscope (Olympus confocal FV1000). Antibodies used for immunohistochemistry are: Sema3A (ABCAM # ab23393), Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) (ABMCA, # ab7817) and βIII-tubulin (ECM). Secondary antibodies are Alexa 594 (Invitrogen, # A11005) and Alexa 488 (Invitrogen, # A11008).

For visualization of pan-retinal vasculature, flatmount retinas were stained with stained with fluoresceinated Isolectin B4 (Alexa Fluor 594-121413, Molecular Probes) in 1 mM CaCl₂ in PBS for retinal vasculature. For assessment of vascular permeability (see Evans Blue -EB- permeation), we injected mice vitreally with Vehicle and VEGF, after 2 hours of EB injection, the eyes were harvested and retinas were dissected for flatmount or prepared for cryosections and visualization under a fluorescent microscope

Preparation of Lentivirus

We produced infectious lentiviral vectors by transfecting lentivector and packaging vectors into HEK293T cells (Invitrogen) as previously described⁴⁰. Viral supernatants were concentrated by ultra-centrifugation (>500-fold) and titers determined by ELISA for viral p24 antigen using a commercial kit (Clonetech).

Soluble Recombinant NRP1 and Mouse Anti-VEGF

STZ treated diabetic C57BL/6J mice were intravitreally injected with rmNRP1 from plasmid (Mamluk et al., 200217) or R&D Systems at 6 and 7 weeks after STZ administration. Specific mouse anti-VEGF was purchased from R&D Systems (AF-493-NA) and 1 μl was injected at 80 μg/mL. Retinal Evans blue permeation assay was performed at 8 weeks after STZ treatment as described above.

Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as mean ±s.e.m. We used Student's T-test and ANOVA, where appropriate, to compare the different groups; a P<0.05 was considered statistically different.

EXAMPLE 2 Sema3A is Elevated in the Vitreous of Human Patients Suffering from Diabetic Retinopathy

In order to evaluate the potential role of Sema3A in mediating the edematous phenotype observed in DR, we first sought to determine the presence of this guidance cue in the vitreous of patients suffering from DME. Vitreous was recovered during standard vitroretinal surgery from 8 patients. Five samples were obtained from T1DM patients suffering from DME and 3 from control patients (non-vascular pathology) undergoing surgery for macular hole(MH) or Epiretinal Membrane (ERM).

Western blot analysis revealed that both pro- (˜125 kDa) and active (˜95 kDa) forms of Sema3A were robustly induced in patients affected by DME (FIG. 1a,b ). Consistent with a prospective role in DME,ELISA-based detection of Sema3A revealed a significant increase in the vitreous of patients suffering from DME when compared to nonvascular ocular pathologies (control median 3.79 ng/ml [interquartile range {IQR}: 25%, 75%: 2.08 ng/ml, 5.58 ng/ml]; DME median 16.27 ng/ml [IQR: 25%, 75%: 5.770 ng/ml, 35.36 ng/ml]; p=0.0464) (Data not shown). Spectral-domain. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was performed and three-dimensional (3D) maps were generated to evaluate the extent of retinal damage and edema. In contrast to controls sampled DME patients showed significant retinal swelling, specifically in the macular and peri-macular zones as shown in FIG. 1c,d . Detailed DME patient characteristics are presented in FIG. 1 e.

These data provide the rational to explore the role of Sema3A in the context of diabetes-induced retinal vasculopathy.

EXAMPLE 3 Neuronal Sema3A is Upregulated in the Early Phases of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes

Given the elevated levels of Sema3A in the vitreous of DME patients, Applicant sought to elucidate the dynamics and pattern of Sema3A expression in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Streptozotocin (STZ) was administered over 5 consecutive days to 6-week-old C57BL/6J mice, and glycemia was monitored according to the scheme depicted in FIG. 2a . Mice were considered diabetic if their non-fasted glycemia was higher than 17 mM (300 mg/dL).

As early as 4 weeks after induction of diabetes, retinal levels of Sema3A where over 2-fold higher in STZ treated mice when compared to vehicle injected controls (p=0.0045, n=5). These significantly higher retinal levels of Sema3A persisted at 8 weeks (Sema3A, 2.80±0.340; p=0.0011; VEGF, 1.236±0.193; p=0.266, n=8), 12 weeks (Sema3A, 4.07±0.798; p=0.00846; VEGF, 0.923±0.145; p=0.612, n=4), and 14 weeks (Sema3A, 2.44±0.593; p=0.0334; VEGF, 3.26±0.65; p=0.0253, n=3). Importantly, throughout early time points of disease (4-12 weeks), VEGF levels in STZ-treated mice remained at similar levels to that observed in vehicle treated congener mice as has been previously described 24 (FIG. 2b ). At all analyzed time-points, STZ-treated mice showed pathologically elevated blood glucose levels of ˜30 mM (FIG. 2d ; p<0.0001 for both 8 and 4 weeks of diabetes). Importantly, the rise in expression of Sema3A was an early event and preceded pericyte loss as both STZ and vehicle-treated mice showed similar levels of smooth muscle actin (SMA, FIG. 2c ). Similarly, expression levels of the tight junction components occludin and claudin-5 varied minimally at the early time of 8 weeks (FIG. 2e ). Finally mice both STZ- and vehicle-treated mice showed no significant difference in transcript levels for pericyte markers platelet-derived growth factor receptor-b (Pdgfr-b; 1.477±0.364; p=0.219, n=11), NG2 proteoglycan (Ng2; 2.065±0.886; p=0.316, n=4), or alpha smooth muscle actin (a-Sma; 1.342±0.441; p=0.494, n=4).

EXAMPLE 4 The Expression Pattern of Sema3A is Geographically Consistent with a Role in Diabetic Retinopathy

Applicant next sought to determine the cellular source of Sema3A in the diabetic retina. Immunohistochemistry on retinal cryosections revealed that Sema3A was strongly expressed by retinal neurons of the ganglion cell layer (GCL and inner-nuclear layer (INL) (FIG. 2f,g ). The most prominent expression was noted in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as demonstrated by co-localization with the RGC marker βIII-tubulin. Consistent with the retinal immuno-localization of Sema3A, laser-capture micro-dissection of retinal layers from normal and diabetic mice followed by quantitative RT-PCR pinpointed Sema3A to neurons in close proximity to vascular beds (FIG. 2h ).

EXAMPLE 5 Retinal Barrier Function is Compromised by Sema3A

Given the observed rise in retinal Sema3A levels in diabetes, Applicant proceeded to investigate the propensity of Sema3A to disrupt vascular barrier function. Intravitreal injection of Sema3A resulted in a ˜2-fold increase (FIG. 3a ; p<0.01) in retinal vascular permeability as determined by Evans Blue (EB) permeation. This increase was similar to that observed with intravtireal administration of VEGF (FIG. 3a ; p<0.05) or a combination of both Sema3A and VEGF (FIG. 3a ; p<0.01). FIG. 3b depicts confocal images of retinal sections injected with vehicle, VEGF and Sema3A, showing the representative increased pattern of EB leakage. To further examine the ability of Sema3A to compromise endothelial barrier function, Applicant carried out real-time analysis of trans-endothelial electric resistance. Treatment of an intact endothelial monolayer with Sema3A reduced barrier function in a magnitude similar, yet lower than VEGF in the first 6 hours following addition (FIG. 3c ).

Applicant next ascertained that Sema3A activated signaling pathways known to promote vascular permeability. In this respect Applicant investigated, by Western blot analysis, the activation profiles of Src and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) known to transduce extracellular signals that provoke the loosening of endothelial cell tight junctions²⁵⁻²⁸. Stimulation of Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HRMECs) by either Sema3A or VEGF lead to robust phosphorylation of Src at Tyr416 in the activation loop of the kinase domain which is reported to enhance enzyme activity²⁹. In turn, FAK was phosphorylated on Tyr576 and 577 (sites for Src-kinases). Ultimately, the tight junction proteins VE-cadherin became phosphorylated respectively on tyrosine-731 (site associated with increased vascular permeability³⁰⁻³²) (FIG. 3d ). Consistent with the above data on retinal permeability (FIG. 3a ), an additive or enhanced effect was not observed when simulation was performed with a combination of Sema3A and VEGF suggesting that both factors signal via redundant pathways (FIG. 3d ). In accordance to VE-cadherin western blot analysis (FIG. 3d ), flatmounted retinas injected with Sema3A or VEGF showed higher VE-cadherin phosphorylation at Y731 (arrows) than vehicle-injected retinas in co-localization with lectin stained retinal vessels (FIG. 3g ). Similarly, retinal flatmounts from STZ-injected and vehicle-injected mice showed VE-cadherin phosphorylation colocalizing with retinal vessels (FIG. 3h ).

Consistent with a role in disrupting barrier function, confocal microscopy of Sema3A-treated HRMECs revealed pronounced formation of vascular retraction fibers as determined by VE-cadherin and phalloidin staining (white arrows; FIG. 3f ). The observed retraction was similar to that with VEGF alone or with a combination of VEGF and Sema3A. Importantly, at the doses employed in the instant study (100-200 uM) Sema3A did not induce cell death or apoptosis as determined by assessment of activation of caspase-3 (FIG. 3i ). These data underscore the direct effect on retinal vascular permeability of Sema3A.

EXAMPLE 6 Inhibition of Neuron-Derived Sema3A efficiently Reduces Vascular Permeability in T1DM

Recent studies demonstrate that retinal neurons may exert an important influence on the blood vessels that perfuse them 14,33-35. In light of the robust expression of Sema3A in RGCs and the INL as well as its ability to promote vascular leakage, Applicant sought to inhibit production of this guidance cue directly in these cell populations. To specifically block Sema3A production in RGCs or neurons of the INL in vivo, lentiviral (Lv) vectors carrying a shRNA against Sema3A were generated (TTATTTATAGGAAACACTGGG-SEQ ID NO: 11). These Lv vectors with a VSVG capsid exhibit high tropism for RGCs and cells of the ONL when delivered intravitreallyl4,35 (FIG. 4a ). While STZ-treated mice show a 56.8% increase in permeability (FIG. 4b ; p<0.05, n=4) a single intravitreal injection of Lv.shSema3A at 5 weeks of diabetes lead to a significant 62.3% reduction in retinal Sema3A expression (FIG. 4c ; p<0.005, n=3) and provoked a proportional 49.5% decrease in vascular leakage (FIG. 4d ; p<0.05, n=3). Hence, directly targeting Sema3A expression in neurons of the GCL and the INL where Sema3A was most abundantly expressed in diabetic mice (FIG. 2f-h ) effectively reduced pathological vascular leakage.

EXAMPLE 7 Intravitreal Neutralization of Sema3A Reduces Retinal Vascular Permeability

In order to neutralize vitreal Sema3A, we employed recombinant(r) soluble Nrp-1 as a bivalent trap for both Sema3A and VEGF. Neuropilin-1 is a single-pass receptor with its extracellular domain subdivided into distinct sub-domains of which a1a2 binds semaphorin and b1b2 binds VEGF36 (FIG. 4e ). Intravitreal injection of rNrp-1 in STZ mice at week 6 and 7 after induction of diabetes lead to a 48.1% reduction in retinal permeability measured at week 8 of diabetes (FIG. 4f ; p<0.05, n=5); a similar magnitude to that observed with gene silencing of Sema3A (FIG. 4d ). Importantly, neutralization of VEGF with a neutralizing antibody for mouse VEGF164 was not effective at reducing vascular permeability at this early stage of diabetes (vehicle vs anti-VEGF: 0.975±0.0707; P=0.7302//rmNRP1 vs anti-mVEGF: P=0.035, n=5 distinct experiments with a total of 14 mice). This is likely attributed to the fact that VEGF is not increased in diabetic retinas at this early time point (8 weeks) while Sema3A is robustly induced (FIG. 2b ). Together, these data indicate that neutralization of SEMA3A in the diabetic retina is an effective strategy to reduce vasogenic edema.

EXAMPLE 8 Conditional Knockout of Nrp-1, Prevents Sema3A-Induced Retinal Barrier Function Breakdown

In light of Nrp-1 being the receptor for Sema3A, Applicant sought to determine whether knockout of Nrp-1 protects against Sema3A-induced vascular permeability. Because systemic germline deletion of Nrp-1 is embryonic lethal 37-39, a whole-animal tamoxifen-inducible (Tam-inducible) Cre mouse (Tg^(Cre-Esr1)) was generated to induce Nrp-1 exon 2 deletion. To validate Cre recombination at the Nrp-1 locus and confirm disruption of Nrp-1 in vivo, Tg^(Cre-Esr1); Nrp1^(fl/fl) mice (iKO) and littermates were administered Tam or vehicle (Veh) at 6 weeks of age. Systemic administration of Tam over a period of 5 consecutive days lead to an efficient knockout of Nrp-1 in the vascular system as determined by Western blot (FIG. 5a ) and qPCR (FIG. 5b : P=0.0012) and resulted in near complete absence of NRP1 in retinal vessels (assessed by immunofluorescence of retinal cryosections-data not shown). Importantly, Tam-treated iKO (Tam iKO) mice showed no difference in body weight, size or open-field activity compared with littermates from 4 through 20 weeks of age (data not shown). As expected, Tam treated Tg^(Cre-Esr1); Nrp1^(fl/fl) mice with disrupted Nrp-1 were protected against Sema3a-induced vascular permeability following intravitreal injection of Sema3A (1.276±0.2901; P=0.36; n=7 distinct experiments with 21 mice) (FIG. 5c ; while control Tam-treated Tg^(Cre-ESR1)/Nrp1^(+/+) mice showed 3-fold higher vascular leakage in response to Sema3A (2.972±0.2045; P=0.00065; n=3 distinct experiments with a total of 9 mice). Conversely, disruption of Nrp1 did not influence VEGF-induced vascular retinal permeability (Tam-treated Tg^(Cre-Esr1)/Nrp1^(fl/fl)—Vehicle vs VEGF: 1.814±0.1188, P=0.0024, n=3 distinct experiments with a total of 9 mice; Tam-treated Tg^(Cre-Esr1)/Nrp1^(+/+)—Vehicle vs VEGF: 1.783+0.2440; P=0.032, n=3 distinct experiments with a total of 9 mice) (FIG. 5d ) indicating that VEGF-induced retinal vascular permeability does not require NRP1. This is in accordance with previous work. Efficiency of sh-mediated knockdown of Nrp1 was validated by qPCR (data not shown). Collectively, these data confirm that Sema3A-mediated inner-blood retinal barrier function breakdown is NRP1-dependent and validate NPR-1 as a good target for reducing Sema3A-mediated hyperpermeability and blood brain barrier leakage in macular edema.

Although various embodiments of the invention are disclosed herein, many adaptations and modifications may be made within the scope of the invention in accordance with the common general knowledge of those skilled in this art. Such modifications include the substitution of known equivalents for any aspect of the invention in order to achieve the same result in substantially the same way. In the claims, the word “comprising” is used as an open-ended term, substantially equivalent to the phrase “including, but not limited to”. The following examples are illustrative of various aspects of the invention, and do not limit the broad aspects of the invention as disclosed herein.

REFERENCES

1. Gilbert C, Rahi J, Eckstein M, O'Sullivan J, Foster A. Retinopathy of prematurity in middle-income countries. Lancet. Jul. 5, 1997; 350(9070):12-14.

2. Kempen J H, O'Colmain B J, Leske M C, et al. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. April 2004; 122(4):552-563.

3. Chen J, Smith L. Retinopathy of prematurity. Angiogenesis. Mar. 19, 2007; 10(2):133-140.

4. Cheung N. Diabetic retinopathy and systemic vascular complications. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. Mar. 1, 2008; 27(2):161-176.

5. Smith L E. Through the eyes of a child: understanding retinopathy through ROP the Friedenwald lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. December 2008; 49(12):5177-5182.

6. Wang S, Park J K, Duh E J. Novel targets against retinal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diab Rep. August 2012; 12(4):355-363.

7. Antonetti D A, Klein R, Gardner T W. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. Mar. 29, 2012; 366(13):1227-1239.

8. Moss S E, Klein R, Klein B E. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. June 1998; 105(6):998-1003.

9. Silva P S, Cavallerano J D, Sun J K, Aiello L M, Aiello L P. Effect of systemic medications on onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. September 2010; 6(9):494-508.

10. Stahl A, Connor KM, Sapieha P, et al. The mouse retina as an angiogenesis model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. June 2010; 51(6):2813-2826.

11. Stewart M W. The expanding role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in ophthalmology. Mayo Clin Proc. January 2012; 87(1):77-88.

12. Sapieha P, Hamel D, Shao Z, et al. Proliferative retinopathies: angiogenesis that blinds. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. January 2010; 42(1):5-12.

13. Robinson G S, Ju M, Shih S C, et al. Nonvascular role for VEGF: VEGFR-1, 2 activity is critical for neural retinal development. FASEB J. May 2001; 15(7):1215-1217.

14. Joyal J-S, Sitaras N, Binet F, et al. Ischemic neurons prevent vascular regeneration of neural tissue by secreting semaphorin 3A. Blood. 2011; 117(22):6024-6035.

15. Lee P, Goishi K, Davidson A J, Mannix R, Zon L, Klagsbrun M. Neuropilin-1 is required for vascular development and is a mediator of VEGF-dependent angiogenesis in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Aug. 6, 2002; 99(16):10470-10475.

16. Gluzman-Poltorak Z, Cohen T, Shibuya M, Neufeld G. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and neuropilin-2 form complexes. J Biol Chem. Jun. 1, 2001; 276(22):18688-18694.

17. Mamluk R, Gechtman Z, Kutcher M E, Gasiunas N, Gallagher J, Klagsbrun M. Neuropilin-1 binds vascular endothelial growth factor 165, placenta growth factor-2, and heparin via its b1b2 domain. J Biol Chem. Jul. 5, 2002; 277(27):24818-24825.

18. Miao H Q, Soker S, Feiner L, Alonso J L, Raper J A, Klagsbrun M. Neuropilin-1 mediates collapsin-1/semaphorin III inhibition of endothelial cell motility: functional competition of collapsin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-165. J Cell Biol. Jul. 12, 1999; 146(1):233-242.

19. Klagsbrun M, Eichmann A. A role for axon guidance receptors and ligands in blood vessel development and tumor angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. August-October 2005; 16(4-5):535-548.

20. Klagsbrun M, Takashima S, Mamluk R. The role of neuropilin in vascular and tumor biology. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 515:33-48.

21. Soker S, Miao H Q, Nomi M, Takashima S, Klagsbrun M. VEGF165 mediates formation of complexes containing VEGFR-2 and neuropilin-1 that enhance VEGF165-receptor binding. J Cell Biochem. 2002; 85(2):357-368.

22. Appleton B A, Wu P, Maloney J, et al. Structural studies of neuropilin/antibody complexes provide insights into semaphorin and VEGF binding. EMBO J. Nov. 28, 2007; 26(23):4902-4912.

23. Vieira J M, Schwarz Q, Ruhrberg C. Role of the neuropilin ligands VEGF164 and SEMA3A in neuronal and vascular patterning in the mouse. Novartis Found Symp. 2007; 283:230-235; discussion 235-241.

24. Mima A, Qi W, Hiraoka-Yamomoto J, et al. Retinal not systemic oxidative and inflammatory stress correlated with VEGF expression in rodent models of insulin resistance and diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Nov. 29, 2012.

25. Chen X L, Nam J O, Jean C, et al. VEGF-induced vascular permeability is mediated by FAK. Developmental cell. Jan. 17, 2012; 22(1):146-157.

26. Scheppke L, Aguilar E, Gariano R F, et al. Retinal vascular permeability suppression by topical application of a novel VEGFR2/Src kinase inhibitor in mice and rabbits. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008; 118(6):2337.

27. Acevedo L M, Barillas S, Weis S M, Göthert J R, Cheresh D A. Semaphorin 3A suppresses VEGF-mediated angiogenesis yet acts as a vascular permeability factor. Blood. 2008; 111(5):2674-2680.

28. Eliceiri B P, Paul R, Schwartzberg P L, Hood J D, Leng J, Cheresh D A. Selective requirement for Src kinases during VEGF-induced angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Molecular cell. 1999; 4(6):915-924.

29. Hunter T. A tail of two src's: mutatis mutandis. Cell. Apr. 10, 1987; 49(1):1-4.

30. Potter M D, Barbero S, Cheresh D A. Tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin prevents binding of p120- and beta-catenin and maintains the cellular mesenchymal state. J Biol Chem. Sep. 9, 2005; 280(36):31906-31912.

31. Calalb M B, Polte T R, Hanks S K. Tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at sites in the catalytic domain regulates kinase activity: a role for Src family kinases. Molecular and cellular biology. February 1995; 15(2):954-963.

32. Schlaepfer D D, Hanks S K, Hunter T, van der Geer P. Integrin-mediated signal transduction linked to Ras pathway by GRB2 binding to focal adhesion kinase. Nature. Dec. 22-29, 1994; 372(6508):786-791.

33. Kim J, Oh W J, Gaiano N, Yoshida Y, Gu C. Semaphorin 3E-Plexin-D1 signaling regulates VEGF function in developmental angiogenesis via a feedback mechanism. Genes Dev. Jul. 1, 2011; 25(13):1399-1411.

34. Fukushima Y, Okada M, Kataoka H, et al. Sema3E-PlexinD1 signaling selectively suppresses disoriented angiogenesis in ischemic retinopathy in mice. J Clin Invest. May 2, 2011; 121(5):1974-1985.

35. Sapieha P, Sirinyan M, Hamel D, et al. The succinate receptor GPR91 in neurons has a major role in retinal angiogenesis. Nature Medicine. 2008; 14(10):1067-1076.

36. Geretti E, Shimizu A, Klagsbrun M. Neuropilin structure governs VEGF and semaphorin binding and regulates angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2008; 11(1):31-39.

37. Jones E A, Yuan L, Breant C, Watts R J, Eichmann A. Separating genetic and hemodynamic defects in neuropilin 1 knockout embryos. Development. August 2008; 135(14):2479-2488.

38. Kitsukawa T, Shimizu M, Sanbo M, et al. Neuropilin-semaphorin III/D-mediated chemorepulsive signals play a crucial role in peripheral nerve projection in mice. Neuron. November 1997; 19(5):995-1005.

39. Kawasaki T, Kitsukawa T, Bekku Y, et al. A requirement for neuropilin-1 in embryonic vessel formation. Development. November 1999; 126(21):4895-4902.

40. Dull T, Zufferey R, Kelly M, et al. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. Journal of virology. November 1998; 72(11):8463-8471.

41. Antipenko A et al. (2003) Structure of the semaphorin-3A receptor binding module. Neuron 39: 589-598.

42. Shirvan A. et al., (2002). Anti-semaphorin 3A Antibodies Rescue Retinal Ganglion Cells from Cell Death following Optic Nerve Axotomy. JBC 277 (51): 49799-49807. 

1-31. (canceled)
 32. A method of reducing the damages of retinal ischemia or hypoxia in a subject comprising administering to said subject an effective amount of a soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide or an anti-Sema3A antibody.
 33. The method of claim 32, wherein said method comprises administering to said subject an effective amount of the soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide.
 34. The method of claim 33, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprising a sequence having at least 90% identity with the sequence of the a1 and a2 domains of human Nrp-1 in SEQ ID NO:13.
 35. The method of claim 34, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprises a sequence having at least 95% identity with the sequence of the a1 and a2 domains of human Nrp-1 in SEQ ID NO:13.
 36. The method of claim 35, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprises a sequence having at least 90% identity with the sequence of the a1, a2 and b1 domains of human Nrp-1 in amino acids 23 to 428 of SEQ ID NO:2.
 37. The method of claim 36, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprises a sequence having at least 95% identity with the sequence of the a1, a2 and b1 domains of human Nrp-1 in amino acids 23 to 428 of SEQ ID NO:2.
 38. The method of claim 37, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprises a sequence having at least 98% identity with the sequence of the a1, a2 and b1 domains of human Nrp-1 in amino acids 23 to 428 of SEQ ID NO:2.
 39. The method of claim 38, wherein said soluble Nrp-1 polypeptide comprises the amino acid sequence of amino acids 23 to 428 of SEQ ID NO:2.
 40. The method of claim 32, wherein said method comprises administering to said subject an effective amount of the anti-Sema3A antibody.
 41. The method of claim 32, wherein the retinal ischemia or hypoxia is caused by retinal vein occlusion.
 42. The method of claim 41, wherein said retinal vein occlusion is central retinal vein occlusion.
 43. The method of claim 41, wherein said retinal vein occlusion is branch retinal vein occlusion.
 44. The method of claim 32, wherein said the retinal ischemia or hypoxia is caused by glaucoma.
 45. The method of claim 44, wherein said glaucoma is neovascular glaucoma.
 46. The method of claim 32, wherein said retinal ischemia or hypoxia is caused by eye injury or eye surgery.
 47. The method of claim 32, wherein said retinal ischemia or hypoxia is caused by age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
 48. The method of claim 32, wherein said retinal ischemia or hypoxia is caused by retinopathy of prematurity.
 49. The method of claim 32, wherein said pharmaceutical composition is administered intraocularly. 